Lady Gaga has a personal drone. And she’s made it into a dress. I guess she’s also on the cutting edge of technology. She even beat Amazon to it.
Yes, the United States government is continuing the drone race by developing a new stealth drone (and it’s being developed at Area 51). What’s especially interesting about this article is that it makes the claim about the drone race– that what we’ve feared would happen with the development of this new technology (and has happened with pretty much every technology in the past) actually happened and is still happening. New countries have developed drone technology, and other actors are catching up to us. This new drone development will only further the arms race.
This is both really cool and really terrifying– the United States has successfully launched a drone from an underwater submarine. The article also indicates that the program only took six years to complete, which is significantly quicker than most new military technologies. I suppose the drone warfare program has continued to grow and still continues to grow. The fact that we have these capabilities unfortunately means that other countries will soon have these capabilities as well. Hopefully the tech won’t be used for too much warfare.
I think it’s important to discuss what types of drone strikes there are, and the effects that they have, because there are definitely some distinctions involved in this technical warfare that makes certain strikes applicable in certain situations. This list is by no means meant to be complete, but I think it discusses some of the more common strikes used and what their purposes are. Look to this article and this article for references.
The most common types of drone strikes are signature strikes and targeted killing. A lot of people conflate these two types of attacks. While extremely similar, there are some key differences that make them different. Signature strikes are conducted upon individuals who’s names and identities aren’t known. They are conducted upon individuals whom the government believes fits the requirement of conducting a terrorist activity (which ends up being a rather loose definition), while targeted killing is conducted upon individuals whom we know for sure are terrorists. If we had killed bin Laden with a drone strike, that would have been targeted killing, not a signature strike. Signature strikes are more commonly cited as the more destabilizing and debilitating drone strikes conducted in Pakistan.
Two other types of drone strikes that are distinctly different from signature strikes and targeted killings are overt combat operation drone strikes and covert combat operation drone strikes. Overt strikes are done explicitly in conjunction with regular military operations. These are different than covert strikes, which are done covertly.
One final type of drone usage (that is not a strike) is surveillance drones. These are used, as the name implies, for surveillance purposes, not for attacking purposes. These drones do not have weapons equipped to them (although they certainly have the capacity to have them equipped) and are instead used for acquiring intelligence and tracking individuals and such.